We Have A New Look

Welcome to our new look. Both Larry and I are working hard to improve the user experience visitors have on our site. Look for new changes in our sidebars and elsewhere. We also have a new YouTube page where we will be posting more videos. Thank you to everyone who participated in our polls. We will be keeping all the new polls on the Events page if you are wondering where they went. - RobertM
________________________________________________________________

December 17, 2009

Goldman Sachs Links and News - December 16, 2009

Goldman Sachs Capital PartnersImage via Wikipedia
Bank Bonuses: The 'Fat Cats' Try to Look Slimmer
BusinessWeek
Goldman Sachs Accused by Teamsters of Driving YRC Toward Ruin
Bloomberg
Two bills in Congress restore Glass-Steagall
Reuters
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Role Should Be Probed, Labor Union Says
Bloomberg 
McCain backs restoring Glass-Steagall bank limits
Reuters
Goldman Sachs Traders: Firm's Ethos Fading With Blankfein As CEO
By The Huffington Post News Team
RagingDebate.com » Economy » Max Keiser: “Goldman Sachs Are Scum”
By JasonRines 
Goldman Sachs has changed | Investing Contrarian
By Investing Contrarian
Goldman Protests Moun
ABC News
Has Goldman Sachs Lost Its Luster?
Reuters
Dumbest moments in business 2009 - Goldman Sachs's PR blitz (1 ...
As Goldman Thrives, Some Say an Ethos Has Faded
New York Times
Obama brings purrs from Wall Street's fat cats
Washington Examiner
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

2 comments:

  1. MUST BE NICE...SOMEONE ELSE ALWAYS HOLDS THE BAG FOR THESE GUYS!


    Can I have a loan and an equity investment to allow me to boost my bonuses to about $20 million?

    I think one of the most important points are being missed. Most of
    these banks swore that they didn't need TARP. Despite this, in order
    to return it, they must go back out to the capital markets. Why do you
    have to hit the market to return a loan that you said you didn't need,
    unless you needed it? This obvious lie has went unchallenged.

    It gets worse. Citi is diluting the hell out of it shareholders, as
    well as all of the other TARP banks that are selling shares. Some may
    even be taking on debt. They are doing this primarily to gain the
    freedom to declare bonuses at higher rates despite uncertain credit
    condition surrounding the toxic assets that caused the problem in the
    first place. Why in the world would any lender or shareholder agree to
    dilution and/or higher debt service "primarily" to pay higher bonuses
    to employees in the highest compensated (as a percent of net revenue)
    industry in the world???

    Imagine if you ran this business, you have rocky times during a
    recession with revenues in nearly all aspects of your business down
    save the blatant risk taking of trading, and you go to your bank and
    say I need a big loan so I can pay myself a $20 million bonus
    increase.
    Do you think Citibank would give you this loan? They expect it from
    their shareholders. The same goes for Goldman, JPM, BAC, etc.

    http://tinyurl.com/ye8q3ff

    ReplyDelete
  2. McCain's Redemption?

    Reinstating Glass-Steagall would be a near-total reversal of his previous position. It would be recognition of the facts: Banks that are allowed to gamble in the financial markets inherently are gambling with the sovereign credit of The United States, and inevitably transfer their losses to the taxpayer while keeping ALL of the profits for their overpriced staff and executives.

    This is often said to be of "benefit" to the public because these banks are public companies. This is a flat lie:

    Goldman typically bonuses out roughly half of their gross profits, with only a minuscule piece being paid in dividends to shareholders. Other banks have similar compensation policies.


    http://tinyurl.com/ycx3qgo

    ReplyDelete